Governed. Auditable. Defensible.
A compliance hub with persistent access. Curated policies provide fractional, subject-specific access to the compliance officer's judgement, available the moment it is needed. Audited, defensible — a single source of guidance applied to any activities as required.
Every other compliance framework operates at firm level. Write a policy. Train the staff. Audit annually. Hope everyone follows it. That works when compliance is about processes and procedures that change slowly and can be documented in advance.
AI does not work that way. Every employee is making individual decisions about what to put into AI, moment by moment, at their desk. What data to share. What questions to ask. What outputs to trust. The compliance gap is not at firm level. It is at user level — at the point of use, in real time.
Your staff are already using AI. Faster than any policy document can keep up. The gap between user behaviour and firm governance is where the risk sits.
That is the current state of almost every firm in your sector.
Anthropic builds four products — Web, Code, Workbench, and Coworker. Each powerful on its own. Your staff are probably already using one or more of them on personal accounts, ungoverned, undocumented.
The platform consolidates all four into a single interface with a single commercial API key. Expert knowledge imported and exported. Every interaction documented, temporal, and recorded. Your staff get enterprise-level AI tools for day-to-day operations — not a cut-down, restricted version. The full power, governed.
This is not compliance layered on top of AI. This is AI delivered through compliance. One interface. Full capability. Complete governance.
Compliance has always been friction. Always been overhead. The thing that slows you down. The policy nobody reads. The training day nobody remembers. The audit that disrupts everything.
This is different. By consolidating AI into a single governed interface — with your firm's constitution, your expert knowledge, your policies enforced at point of use — the compliance framework actually makes the AI experience better. Staff get an AI that already knows the firm. Already understands the standards. Already speaks in the right voice.
They do not feel restricted. They feel equipped. Better tools, not fewer tools. More capability, not less.
The employees using AI on personal accounts are not rogue actors. They are your most productive people trying to do better work with better tools. They just do not have a governed channel to do it through.
Ban AI and they use it anyway — on personal devices, without oversight, without protection. That is the worst outcome: uncontrolled risk with zero visibility.
The platform gives them the channel. AI that already knows the firm's standards. Protection from mistakes they did not know they were making. Innovation with confidence.
Every one of these was avoidable. Not with better policies. Not with better training. With a governed interface that operates at the point of use.
Court cases involving AI-hallucinated legal citations. Ungoverned outputs submitted without review.
Exposed by judiciary reviews, 2023–2025
Employees leaked proprietary source code via ChatGPT within weeks of rollout. Ungoverned inputs on personal accounts.
Bloomberg, 2023
Sanctions imposed on law firms for AI-generated fabricated case citations. No approval gate. No review.
Mata v. Avianca, SDNY 2023
"There is no end in sight" — federal judges on AI-fabricated submissions.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, 2024
The platform does not just prevent these failures. It creates the evidence that proves you governed responsibly — before anyone asks.
The firm sets the rules. The platform enforces them — proportionately. The employee experiences governance as invisible most of the time. Just a better AI that already knows the standards.
AI regulation is not a fixed target. The EU AI Act phases in through 2026. Professional bodies publish new guidance quarterly. Insurers update requirements at every renewal.
Static policies fail. A governance document written today is outdated tomorrow. The platform's policy framework is living infrastructure — updated centrally, deployed instantly, applied to every interaction from that moment forward.
When regulation changes, your governance changes with it. No gap. No lag. No exposure.
Every supervisory body. Every professional body. Every regulator in every jurisdiction is arriving at the same conclusion: firms need to know what their AI is doing. Not tomorrow. Now.
The debate about what AI should or should not do will continue for years. The requirement that you know what it is doing is already settled.
Getting the platform right matters more for regulated firms than anyone else. The constitution, the policy framework, the enforcement levels, the temporal compliance structure — every element needs to reflect your specific regulatory obligations.
Our network of domain specialists have built governance frameworks for firms under FCA, SRA, ICAEW, and professional body supervision. They configure your platform around your regulatory reality — not a generic template.
For firms with internal compliance resource and confidence in their own AI governance setup.
Get StartedA governance specialist configures your platform, builds your compliance framework, and ensures you can evidence responsible AI use from day one.
Find a SpecialistConsumer Duty policy, DISP complaint rules, your procedures — anchored. Internal drafts, HR files, anything outside scope — deliberately excluded. Your AI only knows what you permit.
Not a chatbot. Not generic advice. Responses grounded in your Consumer Duty policy and DISP procedures — the documents you just anchored.
Grounded in your Consumer Duty policy. Asks the right clarifying questions. Logged, attributed, auditable.
Dear Mrs Smith,
We are genuinely disappointed you are unhappy and at this time our immediate goal is to understand and address your issues as quickly as we can.
We hope you appreciate that we need to gather the background and circumstances that have led to your complaint so we can undertake a thorough investigation.
I have reviewed your email and there are some small pieces of information missing. Would you mind supplying us with a couple of clarifications.
You mentioned that you have been a client since 2021, however our records show a later date. Was there a previous address prior to your current one?
You also mentioned that the marketing material you received made it clear you would not be asked for additional contributions. May I ask — do you have a copy of the document you are referring to?
If you could respond with the above, we will have all we need to start a complete investigation.
Yours sincerely,
Complaints Team
Sent to Mrs Smith. Interaction logged. PII gates passed. Audit record written.
Type "Mrs Smith" and see every interaction — what came in, which knowledge sources were cited, which PII gates passed, what was sent. If the FCA asks, you have the answer before they finish the question.
| Time | Ref | From | Subject | PII in | Sources cited | Status |
|---|
"I built this because I needed it and it didn't exist. I was an MLRO at a regulated firm under FCA investigation. I knew exactly what the regulator would ask. I had no way to prove what our AI had done, why, or who had approved it. That gap nearly cost us everything. This platform closes it."
Henry Porter
Former MLRO & FCA-regulated firm director · FCA FRN 789335 · Founder, itisyour.ai
Fuel, not friction. Every supervisor is already asking the question. The answer is not "we do not use AI." The answer is: we know. Set up in a day. Defended forever.
Both paths from £59/month per firm. Not per seat. Cancel anytime.